What's Good for the Goose....

Since ALMOST NOBODY in the USA appears to give a rat's ass that Rolling Stone magazine recklessly, pre-emptively declared Dzhokhtar Tsarnaev GUILTY last week, I propose more convenient tactics of that kind. Oh yes indeed, there's no need, no need whatsoever for that quaint, obsolete precept that USED TO presume a defendant innocent until PROVEN guilty. Examples abound: George W. Bush is so TRANSPARENTLY guilty of having lied us into unjustified war against Iraq that we don't need no stinking trial regarding W's unspeakable crimes against humanity. He's directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who posed America no threat at all. Let's just toss him into Leavenworth, and throw away the key. Hell, I'd go even further - I'll let the viewers of this blog determine what Bush's appropriate punishment should be... no need, no need for a jury of Bush's peers, and some silly goddamn magistrate to pass sentence. Ronald Reagan was OBVIOUSLY culpable of trading weapons for hostages in the Iran-Contra affair - he should have been INSTANTLY punished - preferably by a howling MOB, to the utmost! Never mind any type of judicial process. Barack Obama should be removed from office immediately! Why? For his rampant violations of international law, like waging - even escalating - an unconstitutional, undeclared war against Afghanistan. Not to mention the fact the president meets with his equally bloodthirsty advisors in the White House every Tuesday Morning, to decide which American citizens/foreigners need to be added to his obscene "Kill List." No need, no need at all for impeachment proceedings: we all know he's guilty as hell of tossing lethal drones against unarmed civilians. We Americans are so superior to the rest of Humanity, we NEED NOT BOTHER with trials, hearings, or any other type of procedure to ferret out and definitively establish the actual TRUTH. Yeah, RIGHT! And the Constitution is nothing more than a lousy scrap of paper.